7. Assessment


7.1 Monitoring Students

To monitor students playing a Scenario, click FACILITATE.


7.2 Assessment Options

To assess students, choose one or a combination of the options in the table below that best match your preferences. Consider creating a rubric that assigns a percentage to each assessment method. The options are listed in no particular order and are detailed below the summary table.

METHOD DESCRIPTION
Participation Award points for participating in each PERIOD of the simulation. Provides maximum fairness with results completely in student control.
Performance Award points based on performance results as compared to other teams in the same cohort. This approach is competitive and performance-based.
Report or Presentation Encourages students to reflect on their simulation experience and what they learned, and then organize and present their thoughts. Assessment requires instructor or TA to review report, which can be more subjective and time-consuming.
Team Evaluation Award points based on how each student is evaluated by their teammates. You can also have individuals evaluate themselves for self-reflection.


7.3 Assessment Details


7.3.1 Participation


7.3.2 Performance

Award points based on team or individual SCORE as compared to others in the same simulation. Example:


7.3.3 Student Experience Report or Presentation


7.3.4 Team Evaluation


📝 Team Evaluation

Copy the text and table below to provide to your participants. You may want to create a printable document.  If you do not have the time or desire to collect or share sensitive feedback with participants, consider having them do the evaluation on themselves for self-reflection — this alone can be a useful exercise.

Directions

Evaluate YOURSELF and each of your TEAMMATES using the rating system shown below. Your teammates will be completing a similar evaluation. Your name and responses will be made available to your Simulation Manager (Instructor), who may or may not share this information with others.

Rating Points Description
Great 1.5 points Your teammate was very good at this, perhaps one of the best on your team.
Good 1 point Your teammate was good at this and met the expectations of your team.
Not Good 0 points Your teammate did not meet the expectations of your team.
Unknown 0 points You did not interact enough with your teammate to know how to rate them, or this question does not apply to how your team worked together.

fe0eb41036e697ce881ebf47c48f054cce895aa0221e6bc7701a1b0beb46dd1907c35519556cb13dc5c4619164ef233cead81f6cd0da2f392262e44aaad9a89abf14c62bf6fa0d855398ceb61246c5e90dc4992b6662d3c0c8a9ba961c0bfbb9fb670adb.avif